BARAN v. ASRC MSE et al
ANNA BARAN |
ASRC MSE and ABC BUSINESS ENTITIES 1-100 |
1:2022cv04391 |
July 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Ann Marie Donio |
Robert B Kugler |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 BRIEF in Opposition filed by ANNA BARAN re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (alb, ) Modified on 8/15/2022 (Filed via ECF Help Desk) (alb, ). Modified on 8/18/2022 (tf, ). |
Filing 11 REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion filed by ASRC MSE re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(LABORDA NELSON, ALEXA) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by ASRC MSE re #7 MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Service)(LABORDA NELSON, ALEXA) |
Filing 9 Plaintiff's BRIEF in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #8 filed by ANNA BARAN. (Filed via ECF Help Desk) (alb, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by ASRC MSE. Responses due by 8/1/2022 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(LABORDA NELSON, ALEXA) |
Set Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Motion set for 8/15/2022 before Judge Robert B. Kugler. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (alb, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to New Jersey Superior Court by ANNA BARAN. (received via ecf helpdesk) (alb) Modified on 7/19/2022 (tf, ). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by ALEXA JOY LABORDA NELSON on behalf of ASRC MSE (LABORDA NELSON, ALEXA) |
Set Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Remand to New Jersey Superior Court. Motion set for 8/15/2022 before Judge Robert B. Kugler. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (alb) |
Filing 5 Consent & Registration Form to Receive Documents Electronically (received via ecf helpdesk) by ANNA BARAN (jab) |
Filing 4 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jab,N.M.) |
Clerk`s Text Order - The Application for a Clerk's Order Extending Time to Answer- Document #3 submitted by ASRC MSE on 7/5/2022 has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 7/22/2022. (jab) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Cause of Action,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jab) |
Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (LEAHY, WILLIAM) |
Judge Robert B. Kugler and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (dmw) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ASRC MSE. (LEAHY, WILLIAM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ASRC MSE from Burlington, case number L-924-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13533560), filed by ASRC MSE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(LEAHY, WILLIAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.