MARSHALL v. LOMBARDO et al
| CAROLE MAE MARSHALL |
| WARDEN DONALD J LOMBARDO, CAPTAIN MAYQUIL, LT. CAMBELL, LT. PRINCE, SGT. NEATHERBY, SGT. TAYLOR, SGT. COLDWELL, SGT. KILLROY, SGT. WEATHERBY, SGT. NEILSON, OFFICER ERPEN, OFFICER PEREDNAS, OFFICER PEREZ, OFFICER WOMACK, OFFICER HOOVER and OFFICER ROSE SILIPENA |
| 1:2022cv04404 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Christine P O'Hearn |
| Elizabeth A Pascal |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATING Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Appoint Pro Bono; Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this matter for failure to comply with Local Civil Rule 10.1(a), WITHOUT PREJUDICE to reinstatement should Plaintiff notify the Court of her changed address within thirty (30) days from entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 8/2/2022. (mag, N.M.)
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (mag) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. NEF of docket entry #1 and #2 . Mail sent to CAROLE MAE MARSHALL (jab) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by CAROLE MAE MARSHALL. (jab,N.M.) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP Declaration in Support, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Envelope)(jab,N.M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
