MILETTA v. MAYORKAS et al
| DAVID JOHN MILETTA, JR. |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and MERRICK GARLAND |
| 1:2022cv06410 |
| November 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Robert B Kugler |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 2/3/2022. (alb, ) |
| Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer Attorney BROOKS E. DOYNE for MERRICK GARLAND,BROOKS E. DOYNE for ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS added. (DOYNE, BROOKS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by BROOKS E. DOYNE on behalf of MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS (DOYNE, BROOKS) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jab,N.M.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jab,N.M.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number CAM014065), filed by DAVID JOHN MILETTA, JR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(jab,N.M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
