SMITH et al v. TRUIST BANK et al
| MARK SMITH and MARK TYRONE SMITH REVOCABLE TRUST COMPANY |
| TRUIST BANK and LEE KEILUHN |
| 1:2022cv06526 |
| November 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Sharon A King |
| Karen M Williams |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number CAM14247 (jab,N.M.) |
Filing 5
Order Denying #1 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; directing the Clerk to administratively terminate this case. Plaintiff shall have an opportunity to reopen this action by refiling his Complaint and pay all appropriate costs and fees within thirty days from the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Karen M. Williams on 12/16/2022. (jab)
|
| ***Civil Case Administratively Terminated. (jab) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised that the Request for Default judgment submitted by Mark Smith on 12/2/2022 cannot be granted as requested because plaintiff`s application for In Forma Pauperis is pending before the Court and the Complaint is not yet filed. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the Court. This message is for informational purposes only. (dmw) |
| Filing 4 Letter Brief in Support of Motion for Default Judgment from MARK SMITH (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service, #2 Envelope)(dmr) |
| Clerk's Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by TRUIST BANK has been DENIED. In light of the pending in forma pauperis application being reviewed by the Court and Court summonses having not been issued, the Clerk cannot grant an application for an extension at this time. (dmr) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to the Complaint.. (STEINLIGHT, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jab) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (jab) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised that although an individual is entitled to proceed pro se, a corporation must be represented by counsel. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. This message is for informational purposes only. (jab) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Consent to Receive Documents Electronically, #4 Envelopes)(jab) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/9/2022: #5 Text of Proposed Order) (jab, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
