DONAHUE et al v. SYNCHRONY BANK
| KEITH DONAHUE and DOCTOR FIX-IT, LLC |
| SYNCHRONY BANK |
| 1:2022cv07306 |
| December 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Sharon A King |
| Christine P O'Hearn |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1640 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER: The initial scheduling conference on March 7, 2023 at 10:00 am shall be held VIA TELEPHONE. Counsel shall utilize the following dial-in instructions for the conference 1-888-278-0296 Access code 2961061#. Additionally, the joint discovery plan shall be filed on the docket. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 2/10/23. (mb, )
|
|
Filing 11
Order Initial Conference set for 3/7/2023 at 10:00 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 2/9/2023. (dmr)
|
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SYNCHRONY BANK identifying Synchrony Financial as Corporate Parent.. (SKELTON, AUSTIN) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by SYNCHRONY BANK. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(SKELTON, AUSTIN) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting Defendant Synchrony Bank's First Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by 2/7/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 2/1/2023. (dmr)
|
| Filing 7 Letter from Austin D. Skelton. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SKELTON, AUSTIN) |
| Filing 6 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer Attorney AUSTIN DOUGLAS SKELTON for SYNCHRONY BANK added. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SKELTON, AUSTIN) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Letter filed by Austin D. Skelton on 1/31/2023 was submitted incorrectly as an Application for a Clerk's Order #6 . PLEASE RESUBMIT using the "Letter" event found under Other Documents. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (dmr) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by AUSTIN DOUGLAS SKELTON on behalf of SYNCHRONY BANK (SKELTON, AUSTIN) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DOCTOR FIX-IT, LLC. (SCHWARTZ, NOAH) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by KEITH DONAHUE, DOCTOR FIX-IT, LLC. SYNCHRONY BANK served on 1/10/2023, answer due 1/31/2023. (SCHWARTZ, NOAH) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to SYNCHRONY BANK. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jab) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Cause of Action,Jury Demand,Nature of Suit, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jab) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party or intervenor. Please refer to the Court's website at #www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (jab) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jab) |
| Judge Christine P. O'Hearn and Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. (dmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SYNCHRONY BANK ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number BNJDC-13899151) with JURY DEMAND, filed by KEITH DONAHUE, DOCTOR FIX-IT, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCHWARTZ, NOAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
