MORGAN v. USV OPTICAL, INC. et al
| LACIE MORGAN |
| USV OPTICAL, INC. and U.S. VISION, INC. |
| 1:2022cv07485 |
| December 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Sharon A King |
| Christine P O'Hearn |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Jean S. Martin, Esquire. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 2/15/2023. (dmr)
|
| Filing 9 DECLARATION of Amended Declaration of Jean Sutton Martin, Esq. re #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice , #7 Certificate of Good Standing by LACIE MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing- North Carolina Bar, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing- US District Court North Carolina)(DELGADO, GAMALIEL) |
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER: Within ten (10) days of the date of this Text Order, the party filing its pro hac vice motion [ECF No. 6] shall file an amended certified statement of the applicant disclosing, for each bar in which the applicant is a member in good standing, the name and address of the office or official maintaining the roll of such members; or in lieu thereof, the applicant may a certificate of good standing. See L. Civ. R. 101.1(c)(1). The amended certified statement shall also be dated. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King on 2/10/23. (mb, )
|
| Filing 7 Certificate of Good Standing of PRO HAC Jean S. Martin. (MARTIN, JEAN) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion set for 2/21/2023 before Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dmr) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by LACIE MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DELGADO, GAMALIEL) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to U.S. VISION, INC., USV OPTICAL, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ssp, ) |
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER in all cases in which the basis of jurisdiction is 28 U.S.C. 1332, Diversity of Citizenship: Whether or not the Court issues an Order to Show Cause or other Order directing the filing of an amended pleading or removal petition on the issue of jurisdiction, the parties in all diversity cases are required to complete and file a Joint Certification of the Citizenship of the Parties, #click here, within 30 days of the filing of a Notice of Removal, or where the Complaint is initially filed in this Court, 30 days after an answer, other responsive pleading, or motion has been filed. So Ordered by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 12/28/2022. (ssp, )
|
| Filing 3 Exhibit to #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet by LACIE MORGAN. (DELGADO, GAMALIEL) |
| Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by LACIE MORGAN as to USV OPTICAL, INC.. (DELGADO, GAMALIEL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. VISION, INC., USV OPTICAL, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13917419) with JURY DEMAND, filed by LACIE MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Summons Proposed Summons - US Vision)(DELGADO, GAMALIEL) |
| Judge Christine P. O'Hearn and Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. (mmb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
