ALICEA v. DAVIS et al
| STEVEN ALICEA |
| BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
| 1:2023cv01782 |
| March 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Christine P O'Hearn |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Order Denying #1 -1 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Ordering the Clerk to administratively terminate this case. Petitioner's motion to stay, #2 is ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATED. If Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court in writing within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 5/8/2023. (jab,N.M.)
|
|
ORDER #3 , a blank form application to proceed in forma pauperis DNJ-Pro Se-007-B-(Rev. 09/09), and a blank 2254 habeas corpus petition form, AO 241 (modified): DNJ-Habeas-008 (Rev. 01-2014) sent to Petitioner by regular U.S. mail. (jab,N.M.)
|
| ***Civil Case Administratively Terminated. (jab,N.M.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE by STEVEN ALICEA. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(jab,N.M.) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Received, filed by STEVEN ALICEA. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Certification in Support of IFP, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Certificate of Service, #6 Envelope)(jab,N.M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
