Marshall et al v. Kaplus
Plaintiff: ROSALIN DENISE MARSHALL and Tijuana Rene Johnson
Defendant: HOWARD L. KAPLUS
Case Number: 1:2023cv02499
Filed: May 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2023 Filing 5 Certified Copy of Transfer Order and docket received, Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:23-cv-03257. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
April 25, 2023 MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: Tijuana Rene Johnson 2785 N. Constitution Rd. Camden, NJ 08104; Rosalin Denise Marshall 845 E. Foothill Blvd #A Monrovia, CA 91016. (kh)
April 24, 2023 CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of District of New Jersey.(rdz)
April 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Court directs the Clerk of Court to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. See 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). A summons shall not issue from this court. This order closes this action in this court The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiffs. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/24/2023) (rro) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
April 19, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(rdz)
April 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Howard L. Kaplus. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 15263)Document filed by Rosalin Denise Marshall, Tijuana Rene Johnson..(rdz) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/20/2023: #1 Receipt) (rdz).
April 19, 2023 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
April 19, 2023 Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) Modified on 4/20/2023 (rdz).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshall et al v. Kaplus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROSALIN DENISE MARSHALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tijuana Rene Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HOWARD L. KAPLUS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?