VERDONE v. RICE & RICE, PC et al
| Catherine Verdone |
| Rice & Quattrone, PC, CTARP LLC, Nancy Rice, Pamela Quattrone, RICE & RICE, PC doing business as RICE & QUATTRONE, PC, ABC COMPANIES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 1-5 |
| 1:2023cv04224 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
BRIEF in Opposition filed by CATHERINE VERDONE re #9 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(LUBER, MATTHEW)
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by All Defendants re #10 MOTION to Remand and for Sanctions (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-C)(MILLER, RICHARD)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #10 MOTION to Remand and for Sanctions. Motion set for 10/16/2023 before Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mag)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Remand and for Sanctions by CATHERINE VERDONE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Brief, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Exhibit A)(LUBER, MATTHEW)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss. Motion set for 10/16/2023 before Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mag)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss by CTARP LLC, PAMELA QUATTRONE, NANCY RICE, RICE & RICE, PC. Responses due by 10/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(MILLER, RICHARD)
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon the pre-motion letters filed by: (1) Defendants Rice & Quattrone, P.C., CTARP LLC, Nancy Rice, and Pamela Quattrone seeking leave to file a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) (Docket No. 4); and (2) Plaintiff Cathy Verdone seeking leave to file a motion to remand (Docket No. 6). Having reviewed those letters and the parties' responses thereto, the Court finds a pre-motion conference unnecessary. Thus, the parties may file their proposed motions if they choose to do so. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 09/06/2023. (Costigan, Roberta)
|
|
Filing 7
Letter re #5 Letter. (JACOBS, NEAL)
|
|
Filing 6
Letter from Plaintiff responding to Defts. pre-motion letter for Motion to dismiss re #4 Letter. (CARR, WILLIAM)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter from Plaintiff requesting Pre-motion Conference for Motion to Remand. (CARR, WILLIAM)
|
|
Filing 4
Letter re 3 Order,,,. (MILLER, RICHARD)
|
|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Rice and Rice, PC (d/b/a Rice and Quattrone, P.C.), CTARP LLC, Nancy Rice and Pamela Quattrone (collectively,"Defendants"). [Docket No. 2.] Pursuant to the Court's Individual Rules and Procedures I.A, (https://www.njd.uscourts.gov/sites/njd/files/ProceduresJudgeReneeMarieBumb.pdf ), "[i]n an effort to resolve cases expeditiously, before bringing a motion to dismiss,... a party must submit a letter" described therein. Defendants having failed to do so, the Motion is hereby ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATED pending Defendant's compliance with the Court's Individual Rules and Procedures. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 08/15/2023. (Costigan, Roberta)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by CTARP LLC, PAMELA QUATTRONE, NANCY RICE, RICE & RICE, PC. Responses due by 9/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion, #2 Exhibit Ex. A, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(MILLER, RICHARD)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Motion set for 9/18/2023 before Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mag)
|
|
Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (ssp, )
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party names must be entered in CAPITAL LETTERS, fictitious parties must to be added as they appear in the state court complaint, and aliases must be added in the field provided on the 'Case Participants' screen; failure to enter party names correctly also results in the case caption generating incorrectly . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (ssp, )
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Rice & Quattrone, PC, CTARP LLC, Pamela Quattrone, Nancy Rice from NJ Superior Court, case number BUR-L-001328-23. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14511105), filed by Rice & Quattrone, PC, CTARP LLC, Pamela Quattrone, Nancy Rice. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS 44)(JACOBS, NEAL)
|
|
Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (dmw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
