KAETZ v. THOMAS et al
WILLIAM F. KAETZ |
JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS, JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI, JUDGE KEVIN MCNULTY, JUDGE RENEE MARIE BUMB, JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, JUDGE CHRISTINE P. O'HEARN, JUDGE J. NICHOLAS RANJAN, JUDGE MARK R. HORNAK, JUDGE JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR., JUDGE MATTHEW W. BRANN, JUDGE MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and JUDGE MICHAEL A. SHIPP |
1:2023cv21026 |
October 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Renee Marie Bumb |
Sharon A King |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Motion to Strike Docket Number #4 for Scandalous Matter by WILLIAM F. KAETZ. (Received via ECF Help Desk) (dmr) |
Filing 5 Motion for Recusal by WILLIAM F. KAETZ (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in support of Motion for Recusal)(Received via ECF Help Desk)(dmr) |
Filing fee received: $ 402, receipt number 135060 (jjc, ) |
Filing 4 PRECLUSION ORDER (For Informational Purposes Only) Filed in 23cv3377 (RMB/SAK) on 7/18/2023 Signed by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb. (mmb, ) |
Filing 3 Clerk's Letter: Complaint not accompanied by the filing fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis. (jab) |
Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jab) |
Filing 1 Complaint Received. NO FF/IFP (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Consent Form to Receive Documents Electronically)(jab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.