LASTRA v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.
| CHRISTOPHER J. LASTRA |
| SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. |
| 1:2023cv22014 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Matthew J Skahill |
| Karen M Williams |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Order Initial Conference set for 1/24/2024 at 10:30 AM in Camden - Courtroom 3C before Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill on 12/27/2023. (tf, )
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- POA, #2 Exhibit 2 - Note, #3 Exhibit 3 - Mortgage, #4 Exhibit 4 - Notice of Transfer, #5 Exhibit 5 - 7.18.23 Letter, #6 Exhibit 6 - 9.14.23 Mortgage Statement, #7 Exhibit 7 - Mortgage Statements, #8 Exhibit 8 - TILA Disclosure, #9 Exhibit 9 - 9.19.23 Letter, #10 Exhibit 10 - Notice of Intent)(GAUNCE, NICHOLAS) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #6 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 12/22/2023. (mag) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by NICHOLAS M. GAUNCE on behalf of SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. (GAUNCE, NICHOLAS) |
| Filing 6 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. Attorney NICHOLAS M. GAUNCE for SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. added. (GAUNCE, NICHOLAS) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CHRISTOPHER J. LASTRA. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. served on 11/17/2023, answer due 12/8/2023. (Received via ECF Help Desk) (mag) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jab) |
| COMPLAINT filed. Please see docket entry #1 for Complaint. (jab) |
| Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number NEW49267. (ps) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Letter: Complaint not accompanied by the filing fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis. (jab) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jab) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (jab) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. NO FF/IFP (Attachments: #1 Consent & Registration Form to Receive Documents Electronically)(jab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LASTRA v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER J. LASTRA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. | |
| Represented By: | NICHOLAS M. GAUNCE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
