REYES ANAYA et al v. APNA GROCERY LLC et al
| ENRIQUE REYES ANAYA and CONSTANTINO PEREZ DOMINGUEZ |
| APNA GROCERY LLC doing business as APNA BAZAR CASH & CARRY, KHADAG SINGH and DALBIR SINGH |
| 1:2023cv22324 |
| November 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by CAMILLE ANDREA SANCHEZ on behalf of CONSTANTINO PEREZ DOMINGUEZ, ENRIQUE REYES ANAYA (SANCHEZ, CAMILLE) |
| Filing 5 Request for Summons to be Issued by ENRIQUE REYES ANAYA, CONSTANTINO PEREZ DOMINGUEZ as to DALBIR SINGH. (PECHMAN, LOUIS) |
| Filing 4 Request for Summons to be Issued by ENRIQUE REYES ANAYA, CONSTANTINO PEREZ DOMINGUEZ as to KHADAG SINGH. (PECHMAN, LOUIS) |
| Filing 3 Request for Summons to be Issued by ENRIQUE REYES ANAYA, CONSTANTINO PEREZ DOMINGUEZ as to APNA GROCERY LLC. (PECHMAN, LOUIS) |
| Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Complaint by CONSTANTINO PEREZ DOMINGUEZ, ENRIQUE REYES ANAYA. (PECHMAN, LOUIS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against APNA GROCERY LLC, DALBIR SINGH, KHADAG SINGH ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14866817) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ENRIQUE REYES ANAYA, CONSTANTINO PEREZ DOMINGUEZ.(PECHMAN, LOUIS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
