GIST v. MCGANN et al
DARRELL F. GIST |
STEPHANIE MCGANN, ABIGAIL LOPEZ, MR. MURPHY, MS. HANSEN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
1:2023cv23217 |
December 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Robert B Kugler |
Matthew J Skahill |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by DARRELL F. GIST (dmr) |
Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number CAM14856 (ssp, N.M. ) |
COMPLAINT FILED; see docket entry #1 for the Complaint.(ssp, n.m.) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM & ORDER directing the Clerk to administratively terminate this case; ORDERED that Plaintiff may have the case reopened, if, within 30 days, Plaintiff either pre-pays the $405 filing fee or submits to the Clerk a proper complete in forma pauperis application. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 1/2/2024. (dmr) |
***Civil Case Terminated. (dmr) |
Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (ssp, n.m.) |
Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Jason Garcia Declaration, #2 Larry Lovonne Berry, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D-1, #6 Exhibit D-2, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Cover Letter, #12 Envelope) NO FF/IFP ($350.00 referenced in the Cover Letter was not enclosed in the envelope).(ssp, n.m. ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.