HARRIS v. RUDMAN
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. HARRIS and MICHAEL R. HARRIS, ESQ.
Defendant: MITCHELL RUDMAN
Case Number: 1:2023cv23240
Filed: December 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Christine P O'Hearn
Referring Judge: Matthew J Skahill
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2024 Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #12 Stipulation and Order by MITCHELL RUDMAN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(KATZ, PETER)
January 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER extending Defendant's time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to and including February 19, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill on 1/24/2024. (mag)
January 16, 2024 Filing 11 Exhibit to #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Andrew Frisch, Esq. by MITCHELL RUDMAN. (KATZ, PETER)
January 16, 2024 Filing 10 STIPULATION to Extend Time to File Answer by MITCHELL RUDMAN. (KATZ, PETER)
January 16, 2024 Set Deadlines as to #9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Andrew Frisch, Esq.. Motion set for 2/20/2024 before Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (alb, )
January 16, 2024 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Certification #9 submitted by Peter Katz on 1/15/2024 contains an improper signature. Only Registered Users are permitted to sign electronically filed documents with an s/. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE CERTIFICATION ONLY WITH A SCANNED SIGNATURE USING THE **Exhibit (to document)**. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (alb, )
January 15, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Andrew Frisch, Esq. by MITCHELL RUDMAN. (KATZ, PETER)
January 15, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by PETER NEIL KATZ on behalf of MITCHELL RUDMAN (KATZ, PETER)
January 2, 2024 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MICHAEL R. HARRIS, ESQ.. MITCHELL RUDMAN served on 12/26/2023, answer due 1/16/2024. (FRANK, ALAN)
December 21, 2023 Filing 6 Diversity Disclosure Statement by MICHAEL R. HARRIS, ESQ.. (FRANK, ALAN)
December 21, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MITCHELL RUDMAN. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (aji, )
December 21, 2023 Judge Christine P. O'Hearn and Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill added. (dmw )
December 21, 2023 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (aji, )
December 20, 2023 Filing 4 Request for Summons to be Issued by MICHAEL R. HARRIS as to MITCHELL RUDMAN. (FRANK, ALAN)
December 20, 2023 Filing 3 Request for Summons to be Issued by MICHAEL R. HARRIS as to MITCHELL RUDMAN. (FRANK, ALAN)
December 20, 2023 Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by MICHAEL R. HARRIS as to MITCHELL RUDMAN. (FRANK, ALAN)
December 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MITCHELL RUDMAN ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-14954838) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MICHAEL R. HARRIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - KAL DEATH CERT - REDACTED, #3 Exhibit B - LUCILLE DEATH CERT - REDACTED, #4 Exhibit C - LUCILLE 1995 WILL, #5 Exhibit D LUCILLE 2000 FIRST CODICIL, #6 Exhibit E - LUCILLE 2006 SECOND CODICIL, #7 Exhibit F - LUCILLE 2009 THIRD CODOCIL, #8 Exhibit G - SOLOMON 1995 WILL, #9 Exhibit H - SOLOMON FIRST CODOCIL, #10 Exhibit I - SOLOMON SECOND CODICIL, #11 Exhibit J - 2023-04-28 ORDER, #12 Exhibit K -2023-09-22 ORDER, #13 Exhibit L - 2023-12-01 ORDER)(FRANK, ALAN)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARRIS v. RUDMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. HARRIS
Represented By: ALAN LEE FRANK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. HARRIS, ESQ.
Represented By: ALAN LEE FRANK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MITCHELL RUDMAN
Represented By: PETER NEIL KATZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?