RONEY v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
Plaintiff: RAHSHAD RONEY
Defendant: SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, LT. D. PHILLIPS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Case Number: 1:2024cv00835
Filed: February 13, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Matthew J Skahill
Referring Judge: Karen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP; ORDERED that the Complaint #1 shall be filed; ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against the State of New Jersey, the New Jersey Department of Corrections, and South Woods State prison are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; ORDERED that Plaintiff's remaining claims are all DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies in his current complaint within 30 days; ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion seeking appointed counsel (ECF No. 1-7) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Karen M. Williams on 3/4/2024. (dmr)(n.m.)
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 OPINION. Signed by Judge Karen M. Williams on 3/4/2024. (dmr)(n.m.)
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order ***Civil Case Terminated. (dmr)
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order COMPLAINT (Please refer to docket entry #1 ) against DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. PHILLIPS, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, filed by RAHSHAD RONEY.(dmr)
February 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (ssp, n.m. )
February 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint 2, #2 Complaint 3, #3 Exhibits 1, #4 Exhibits 2, #5 Application IFP, #6 Account Certification, #7 Pro Bono Motion, #8 Envelope)(ssp, n.m.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RONEY v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RAHSHAD RONEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LT. D. PHILLIPS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?