PREMIER ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES OF SOUTHERN NJ, LLC v. HIGHMARK, INC.
| PREMIER ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES OF SOUTHERN NJ, LLC |
| HIGHMARK, INC. |
| 1:2024cv00873 |
| February 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Christine P O'Hearn |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: The pre-motion conference presently scheduled for April 4, 2024 at 11:00am is hereby ADJOURNED to April 16, 2024 at 11:00am. So Ordered by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 4/4/24. (hem, )
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER: The Court is in receipt the pre-motion letter filed by Defendant Highmark, Inc. (ECF No. 5), and Plaintiff's response thereto, (ECF No. 7). The Court will hold a pre-motion conference on April 4, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. via Teams. The Court will provide a Teams link to counsels' email addresses as they appear on the docket. So Ordered by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 3/27/24. (hem, )
|
| Filing 7 Letter from Aaron A. Mitchell in response to the Court's Order of March 18, 2024 re 6 Order,, #5 Letter. (MITCHELL, AARON) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER: This matter comes before the Court upon the pre-motion letter filed by Defendant on March 7, 2024. [Docket No. 5] Plaintiff failed to address Defendant's letter within seven (7) days as required by this Court's Individual Rules and Procedures, available at https://www.njd.uscourts.gov/content/christine-p-ohearn. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause before this Court by no later than March 21, 2024 why they have failed to timely respond AND why the relief Defendant seeks in its pre-motion letter should not be granted. If no response is filed, the Court will likely grant Defendant the relief the letter seeks. So Ordered by Judge Christine P. O'Hearn on 3/18/24. (hem, )
|
| Filing 5 Letter from David G. Murphy - on Behalf of Defendant Highmark, Inc. Requesting Pre-Motion Conference in Anticipation of Motion to Dismiss. (MURPHY, DAVID) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HIGHMARK, INC. identifying Highmark Health as Corporate Parent.. (MURPHY, DAVID) |
| Filing 3 Diversity Disclosure Statement by HIGHMARK, INC.. (MURPHY, DAVID) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Corporate Disclosure Statement. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes and added HIGHMARK HEALTH as a corporate parent. This message is for informational purposes only. (mag) |
| Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer Attorney DAVID G. MURPHY for HIGHMARK, INC. added. (MURPHY, DAVID) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by HIGHMARK, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 3/7/2024. (mag) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (sms2) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party or intervenor. Please refer to the Court's website at #www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (sms2) |
| Judge Christine P. O'Hearn and Magistrate Judge Ann Marie Donio added. (dmw) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by HIGHMARK, INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, case number CUM-L-000015-24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15091408), filed by HIGHMARK, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - Complaint, #2 Ex. B - Aff. of Service, #3 Ex. C - Aetna Litigation Amended Notice of Removal, #4 Ex. D - Aetna Litigation PACER Docket, #5 Certification of David G. Murphy, Esq., #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(MURPHY, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PREMIER ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES OF SOUTHERN NJ, LLC v. HIGHMARK, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PREMIER ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES OF SOUTHERN NJ, LLC | |
| Represented By: | AARON AUBREY MITCHELL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HIGHMARK, INC. | |
| Represented By: | DAVID G. MURPHY |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
