TKACHENKO v. THOMPSON et al
MAXIM TKACHENKO |
V. R. THOMPSON and C. PETERS |
1:2024cv00983 |
February 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Karen M Williams |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 LETTER ORDER granting respondent's request to extend time to answer to 5/20/2024. Signed by Judge Karen M. Williams on 4/19/2024. (sms2) |
Filing 4 Letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office Requesting a 30-Day Extension of Time to Answer Petition. (BRADT, TASHA) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by TASHA MARIE BRADT on behalf of V. R. THOMPSON (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(BRADT, TASHA) |
ORDER #2 and Petition #1 have been emailed to USANJ-HabeasCases@usdoj.gov and sent by regular U.S. mail to Respondent. ORDER #2 has also been sent by regular U.S. mail to Petitioner. (jab,N.M.) |
Filing 2 ORDER TO ANSWER: Within 45 days after the date of entry of this Order, Respondent shall file a full and complete answer to the petition. Signed by Judge Karen M. Williams on 3/4/2024. (jab,N.M.) |
PETITION FILED; see docket entry #1 for the Habeas Petition.(ssp, n.m.) |
Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number NEW49773. (ps) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MAXIM TKACHENKO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit s, #2 Envelope) No IFP/FF. (sms2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.