AKOGUN v. AMAZON et al
OLADIMEJI AKOGUN |
AMAZON, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10, fictitious persons and ABC CORP. 1-10, fictitious entities |
1:2024cv01532 |
March 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Sharon A King |
Christine P O'Hearn |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by RACHEL SIMONE FREY on behalf of AMAZON (FREY, RACHEL) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by KEITH J. ROSENBLATT on behalf of AMAZON (ROSENBLATT, KEITH) |
Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Reply Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.1(b). Attorney KEITH J. ROSENBLATT for AMAZON added. (ROSENBLATT, KEITH) |
Filing 3 Diversity Disclosure Statement by AMAZON. (ROSENBLATT, KEITH) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMAZON identifying Amazon.com, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (ROSENBLATT, KEITH) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AMAZON from Superior Court of NJ, Law Division, Burlington Cty, case number BUR-L-002214-23. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15144897), filed by AMAZON. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(ROSENBLATT, KEITH) |
Judge Christine P. O'Hearn and Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. (dmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.