NEGRON VALCAREL v. EMG AUTO OF JERSEY CITY LLC et al
| JOSUE DAVID NEGRON VALCAREL |
| EMG AUTO OF JERSEY CITY LLC D/B/A CAR REVOLUTION and ELIAS M GONZALEZ |
| 1:2024cv02346 |
| March 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Matthew J Skahill |
| Karen M Williams |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EMG AUTO OF JERSEY CITY LLC D/B/A CAR REVOLUTION identifying None as Corporate Parent.. (MORENO, SHIRLEY) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by SALVATORE A. GIAMPICCOLO on behalf of All Defendants (GIAMPICCOLO, SALVATORE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by SHIRLEY MORENO on behalf of All Defendants (MORENO, SHIRLEY) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ELIAS M GONZALEZ, EMG AUTO OF JERSEY CITY LLC D/B/A CAR REVOLUTION ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15162231), filed by ELIAS M GONZALEZ, EMG AUTO OF JERSEY CITY LLC D/B/A CAR REVOLUTION. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF E. VEGA, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #4 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET, #5 Certificate of Service CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE)(MORENO, SHIRLEY) |
| Judge Karen M. Williams and Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill added. (mmb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
