PRINCE v. AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD. et al
| BRIAN PRINCE |
| AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD., MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD., MYLAN N.V., ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., AUROLIFE PHARMA, LLC, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., ACTAVIS, LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC., HUAHAI U.S. INC., SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and JOHN DOE |
| 1:2024cv02946 |
| March 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Sharon A King |
| Robert B Kugler |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS, LLC, AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC., AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD., AUROLIFE PHARMA, LLC, EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., HUAHAI U.S. INC., JOHN DOE, MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD., MYLAN N.V., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC., SOLCO HEALTHCARE U.S., LLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15176149) with JURY DEMAND, filed by BRIAN PRINCE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(PENDLEY, MADELINE) |
| Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. (dmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
