SANCHEZ LEVYA v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Petitioner: GERARDO ANTONIO SANCHEZ LEVYA
Respondent: WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Case Number: 1:2024cv06028
Filed: May 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Edward S Kiel
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Received NO IFP/NO FF, filed by GERARDO ANTONIO SANCHEZ LEVYA. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Envelope)(aji,N.M.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SANCHEZ LEVYA v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: GERARDO ANTONIO SANCHEZ LEVYA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Represented By: JOHN ANDREW RUYMANN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?