NEWELL v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
| JAMES J. NEWELL |
| NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION |
| 1:2024cv08246 |
| August 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Renee Marie Bumb |
| Sharon A King |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER terminating #3 Motion to Dismiss. This matter comes before the Court upon the filing of a motion to dismiss by Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union. (Docket No. 3). The Court administratively terminates the motion as improperly filed. Pursuant to the Court's Individual Rules and Procedures I.A., a party seeking to file a motion to dismiss must file a premotion conference letter setting forth the basis for the anticipated motion with citations to relevant authority. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 09/20/2024. (Costigan, Roberta)
|
| Filing 5 Letter from Thomas Masciocchi, Esq.. (MASCIOCCHI, THOMAS) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Navy Federal Credit Union on 08/15/2024, filed by JAMES J. NEWELL. (MASCIOCCHI, THOMAS) |
| Filing 3 First MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Brief Memorandum of Law, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Form of Order, #3 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(ROCHKIND, ERIC) |
| Set Deadlines as to #3 First MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Motion set for 10/7/2024 before Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sms2) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (aji, ) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (aji, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15564084), filed by JAMES J NEWELL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Summons Summons)(MASCIOCCHI, THOMAS) |
| Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb and Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King added. (dmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NEWELL v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION | |
| Represented By: | ERIC B. ROCHKIND |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMES J. NEWELL | |
| Represented By: | THOMAS GERARD MASCIOCCHI |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
