PAREDES RIVADENEIRA v. GAETANO et al
Plaintiff: JUAN JOSE PAREDES RIVADENEIRA
Defendant: G GAETANO and UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Case Number: 1:2024cv08726
Filed: August 23, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Nature of Suit: Naturalization Application
Cause of Action: 8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2024 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for MAIL served on G. GAETANO, UR MENDOZA JADDOU on 08/27/2024, filed by JUAN JOSE PAREDES RIVADENEIRA. (LAIRD, MITCHELL)
August 27, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to G GAETANO, UR MENDOZA JADDOU. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (aji, )
August 27, 2024 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Request for Summons to be Issued filed by JUAN JOSE PAREDES RIVADENEIRA on 08/23/2024 was uploaded prior to being flattened. Before uploading fillable forms to ECF you must flatten the file to prevent other users from manipulating or editing the information. The easiest way to flatten a PDF form is by selecting Print to PDF and saving the flattened form, other PDF software may differ. Please visit our #website under Flattening PDF Forms for guidance. Your document has been corrected. This message is for informational purposes only. (aji, )
August 27, 2024 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The COMPLAINT #1 submitted by MITCHELL LYNDEN MATTHEW LAIRD on 08/23/2024 appears to have address information that does not match the court's records for this case. Please refer to the court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for information and instructions on maintaining your account. (aji, )
August 27, 2024 Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (aji, )
August 23, 2024 Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb added. (dmw)
August 23, 2024 Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by JUAN JOSE PAREDES RIVADENEIRA as to UR MENDOZA JADDOU, G GAETANO. (LAIRD, MITCHELL) (Main Document 2 replaced on 8/27/2024) (aji, ).
August 23, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UR MENDOZA JADDOU, G GAETANO ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15613155), filed by JUAN JOSE PAREDES RIVADENEIRA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAIRD, MITCHELL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PAREDES RIVADENEIRA v. GAETANO et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JUAN JOSE PAREDES RIVADENEIRA
Represented By: MITCHELL LYNDEN MATTHEW LAIRD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G GAETANO
Represented By: MITCHELL LYNDEN MATTHEW LAIRD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?