HARGROVE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: RASHEED HARGROVE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 2:2004cv02992
Filed: June 24, 2004
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: William G. Bassler
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Ordered that the motion to reconsider Judge Bassler's decision is denied, and the motion to find Mautone as ineffective counsel is denied, and that the case is closed. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 5/10/10. (dc, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARGROVE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RASHEED HARGROVE
Represented By: CATHERINE M. BROWN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: JUDITH H. GERMANO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?