HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. v. COBALT PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
Plaintiff: HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC.
Defendant: COBALT PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and COBALT LABORATORIES, INC.
Case Number: 2:2007cv04540
Filed: September 21, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Patent Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Michael A. Shipp
Presiding Judge: Stanley R. Chesler
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. v. COBALT PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC.
Represented By: DAVID E. DELORENZI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COBALT PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COBALT LABORATORIES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?