LEDONNE v. DAILY RECORD, THE et al
Plaintiff: CAROL SAKOWITZ LEDONNE
Defendant: DAILY RECORD, THE and GANNETT NEWSPAPERS, INC.
Case Number: 2:2008cv01260
Filed: March 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Labor: Fair Standards Office
County: Morris
Presiding Judge: Madeline C. Arleo
Presiding Judge: Susan D. Wigenton
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LEDONNE v. DAILY RECORD, THE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAROL SAKOWITZ LEDONNE
Represented By: ALAN L. KRUMHOLZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAILY RECORD, THE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GANNETT NEWSPAPERS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?