FIRST UNITED MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC. v. MORTGAGE BANKERS/BROKERS PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY
Plaintiff: FIRST UNITED MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant: MORTGAGE BANKERS/BROKERS PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY
Case Number: 2:2008cv02754
Filed: June 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Insurance Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: Mark Falk
Presiding Judge: William J. Martini
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 OPINION. Signed by Judge William J. Martini on 8/17/10. (gh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FIRST UNITED MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC. v. MORTGAGE BANKERS/BROKERS PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FIRST UNITED MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.
Represented By: KEITH A. MCKENNA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MORTGAGE BANKERS/BROKERS PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY
Represented By: JEFFREY W. DILLON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?