MAKHDOOM v. THOMPSON et al
Plaintiff: AHMAD ABDUL MAKHDOOM
Defendant: JOHN THOMPSON and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Case Number: 2:2008cv03543
Filed: July 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Other Immigration Actions Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Dennis M. Cavanaugh
Presiding Judge: Mark Falk
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MAKHDOOM v. THOMPSON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AHMAD ABDUL MAKHDOOM
Represented By: THOMAS E. MOSELEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN THOMPSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?