ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. BED, BATH & BEYOND, INC.
Plaintiff: ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC.
Defendant: BED, BATH & BEYOND, INC.
Case Number: 2:2008cv04412
Filed: September 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr.
Presiding Judge: Esther Salas
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 LETTER ORDER Scheduling a Telephone Conference for 5/26/2009 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Esther Salas.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Esther Salas on 5/22/09. (cs, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. BED, BATH & BEYOND, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC.
Represented By: THOMAS C. MARTIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BED, BATH & BEYOND, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?