FUNK v. CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE et al
| ROBERT FUNK |
| CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE, LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES |
| 2:2008cv05208 |
| October 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Bergen |
| Stanley R. Chesler |
| Michael A. Shipp |
| None |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
OPINION AND ORDER granting pltf's 61 Motion to enforce Settlement; denying deft. Lucent's 66 cross-Motion to enforce the settlement and administratively terminating deft. CGLIC's cross-motion to strike; granting deft. Lucent's cross-motion to seal the settlement (Docket No. 66) and all attachment and closing case. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 3/14/2012. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
49
OPINION AND ORDER denying deft's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment ***; granting pltf's 28 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing defts' couter-claim; ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 08/30/2010. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Faith S. Hochberg and Magistrate Judge Patty Shwartz for all further proceedings. Judge Stanley R. Chesler, Magistrate Judge Michael A. Shipp no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr. on 5/12/09. (cs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
