PRESSLEY v. EAST DISTRICT PRECINCT et al
| DORIAN PRESSLEY |
| EAST DISTRICT PRECINCT, STEVE TROWBRIDGE, BURGESS, GOODMAN, RAGLAND, SWINNEY and LUGO |
| 2:2009cv03215 |
| July 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Hudson |
| Faith S. Hochberg |
| Patty Shwartz |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
OPINION. Signed by Judge William J. Martini on 10/22/15. (gh, )
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION. Signed by Judge Dennis M. Cavanaugh on 1/9/12. (jd, )
|
|
Filing
14
Order on Informal Application denying application for Pro Bono Counsel for DORIAN PRESSLEY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patty Shwartz on 3/15/10. (jd, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Granting IFP and directing the Clerk to file the Complaint; ORDERED that the Complaint may proceed past sua sponte dismissal; and it is further ORDERED that East District Precinct is DISMISSED as defendant; ORDERED that, the Clerk shall forward a copy of this Order by regular mail to the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey and the warden of Hudson County Correctional Center;ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the Clerk shall issue summons and the United States Marshal shall serve summons and copies of the Complaint and this Order upon Defendants, etc.. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 1/6/2010. (ld, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
