EMAR GROUP INC. v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff: EMAR GROUP INC.
Defendant: CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Case Number: 2:2009cv03218
Filed: July 2, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Hudson
Presiding Judge: Katharine S. Hayden
Presiding Judge: Patty Shwartz
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 Order Appointing Arbitrator, SHERYL M. GOSKI appointed. Arbitration Hearing set for 8/13/2010 10:00 AM. Signed by Chief Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr. on 07/15/2010. (chc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EMAR GROUP INC. v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EMAR GROUP INC.
Represented By: JOSEPH JOHN FERRARA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Represented By: MARGARET F. CATALANO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?