QUANQING (CHANGSHU) CLOTH-MAKING CO. LTD. v. PILGRIM WORLDWIDE TRADING, INC.
Plaintiff: QUANQING (CHANGSHU) CLOTH-MAKING CO. LTD.
Defendant: PILGRIM WORLDWIDE TRADING, INC.
Case Number: 2:2009cv03785
Filed: July 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Bergen
Presiding Judge: William J. Martini
Presiding Judge: Patty Shwartz
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 OPINION. Signed by Judge William J. Martini on 6/28/10. (gh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: QUANQING (CHANGSHU) CLOTH-MAKING CO. LTD. v. PILGRIM WORLDWIDE TRADING, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: QUANQING (CHANGSHU) CLOTH-MAKING CO. LTD.
Represented By: DAVID A FALONI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PILGRIM WORLDWIDE TRADING, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?