DAIBES GAS 18, LLC v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Plaintiff: DAIBES GAS 18, LLC
Defendant: STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Case Number: 2:2009cv03931
Filed: August 7, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Bergen
Presiding Judge: Esther Salas
Presiding Judge: Peter G. Sheridan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Letter Order Appointing Mediator, PETER MALOFF appointed.Signed by Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo on 04/14/2010. (cc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DAIBES GAS 18, LLC v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAIBES GAS 18, LLC
Represented By: ROBERT P. TRAVERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Represented By: BRETT A. DATTO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?