JONES v. CITO
Plaintiff: CURTIS JONES
Defendant: JOHN CITO
Case Number: 2:2010cv01218
Filed: March 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
Presiding Judge: Faith S. Hochberg
Presiding Judge: Patty Shwartz
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting Pltf's IFP Appl; Clk is directed to file the Cmp without prepayment of the filing fee; ORDERED that the Cmp is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as against the Public Defender, John Cito, Esq., for failure to stae a Clm at this time. re 5 Opinion. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 7/16/10. (dr, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JONES v. CITO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CURTIS JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN CITO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?