JOHNSON v. DEMICO et al
Plaintiff: LARRY O. JOHNSON
Defendant: DENNIS DEMICO and M. OLIVEIRA
Case Number: 2:2010cv02265
Filed: May 3, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Faith S. Hochberg
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER reopening action, etc.; for purposes of the Instant Matter (10-2265), Pltf's letter (doc #8), is construed as Pltf's first amended complaint; Pltf's first amended complaint is Dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; Clerk shall administratively terminate the Instant Matter (10-2265), etc.; Pltf may have the Instant Matter (10-2265) reopened if, within 45 days from date of entry of this Memorandum Opinion & Order, Pltf files his second amended complaint detailing solely the facts of his "phone list" and ETS claims that were dismissed without prejudice, etc.. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 8/31/11. (jd, )
June 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER; ORDER Granting IFP and directing the Clerk to file the Complaint; ORDERED that the Clerk shall reopen this matter by making a new and separate entry on the docket reading CIVIL CASE REOPENED; ORDERED that Plaintiffs complaint, Dock et Entry No. 1, is dismissed; ORDERED that Plaintiffs challenges based on the alleged lack of Defendant Demicos responses to Plaintiffs grievances are dismissed with prejudice; ORDERED that Plaintiff's challenges based on the alleged Defendant O liveiras refusal to put Plaintiffs name on the phone list" are dismissed without prejudice, etc.,ORDERED that, within forty-five days from the date of entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint detailin g solely the facts of the two above-stated lines of challenges that were dismissed without prejudice ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this matter, by making a new and separate entry on the docket reading CIVIL CASE TERMINATED, subject to reopening upon timely receipt of Plaintiffs amended complaint; ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this MemorandumOpinion and Order upon Plaintiff, together with a blank civil complaint (which Plaintiff may utilize for the purposes of producing his amended complaint, by certified mail, return receipt requested. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 6/1/2011. (ld, ) Modified on 6/2/2011 (ld).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JOHNSON v. DEMICO et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LARRY O. JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DENNIS DEMICO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. OLIVEIRA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?