SUFFOLK FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
SUFFOLK FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Case Number:
2:2010cv02763
Filed:
May 28, 2010
Court:
New Jersey District Court
Office:
Newark Office
County:
Essex
Presiding Judge:
Garrett E. Brown
Nature of Suit:
Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action:
28:1332
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
March 7, 2011 | 34 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SUFFOLK FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SUFFOLK FEDERAL CREDIT UNION | |
Represented By: | KEITH CONNOLLY NUSBAUM |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION | |
Represented By: | ALAN E. KRAUS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.