BAKER v. CITY OF ELIZABETH et al
JAMES BAKER |
CITY OF ELIZABETH, ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT and UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE |
2:2011cv00360 |
January 20, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Union |
Madeline C. Arleo |
Susan D. Wigenton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 179 OPINION. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 9/22/17. (sr, ) |
Filing 151 OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 130 Motion to Compel; denying 137 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 10/11/16. (sr, )(N/M) |
Filing 60 OPINION fld. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 7/8/15. (sr, ) |
Filing 52 ORDER denying 38 Motion for Default Judgment. The pleading served by plaintiff was previously stricken by the Court. The court will hold a telephone conference on 7/17/2015 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel for defendants shall appear in the Clerks Office v ideo conference center for the conference. South Woods State Prison shall produce plaintiff Baker (SBI 322457B) for the tele conference on the date and time set forth herein. Robert Varady, Esq., counsel for the Elizabeth defendants, shall serve a copy of this order upon South Woods State Prison and plaintiff Baker within the next seven days and follow up with the Prison seven days prior to the scheduled conference to confirm same. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion on 1/8/15. (sr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.