EWELL v. THE NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION et al
| ANTHONY EWELL |
| THE NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, MICHAEL GLIDEMAN and JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10 |
| 2:2011cv05107 |
| September 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Hudson |
| Michael A. Hammer |
| Jose L. Linares |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MICHAEL GLIDEMAN, THE NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. Issued By *LEROY DUNBAR* (ld, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL GLIDEMAN, JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10, THE NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number NEW008969.) JURY DEMAND., filed by ANTHONY EWELL. (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ld, ) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - As of May 1, 2006, Civil initial pleadings such as complaints and notices of removal must be filed electronically. Payment of the filing fee is made via the internet (pay.gov). Visit our website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for additional information. In the future, to expedite the processing of the initial pleadings, counsel is requested to file complaints and notices of removal electronically. (ld, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
