D. RUSSO INC. et al v. ROMANKOW et al
| D. RUSSO INC., KEVIN HICKEY and DANIEL RUSSO |
| THEODORE ROMANKOW, TOWNSHIP OF UNION, KEVIN KALENDEK, THE TOWNSHIP OF UNION POLICE DEPARTMENT, DANIEL ANTONELLI, JOSEPH FLORIO, CLIFTON PEOPLE, ANTHONY TERREZZA, MANUEL FIGEUIREDO, SUZETTE CAVADOS, RONALD MANZELLA, RICHARD MILANDA and JOHN DOES 1-100 |
| 2:2012cv02397 |
| April 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Union |
| Stanley R. Chesler |
| Michael A. Shipp |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
OPINION & ORDER Denying 105 Motion for Reconsideration, and also Denying 107 Cross-Motion for Reconsideration, etc. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 5/21/2018. (JB, )
|
|
Filing
90
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 78 Motion for Summary Judgment: Denying Defendants' affirmative defense of qualified immunity to claims of violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983; Granting all claims against Defendant, The T ownship of Union Police Department and Judgment on all claims is hereby entered in Defendants' favor; Granting the Fifth Count of the SAC and Judgment on the Fifth Count is hereby entered in Defendantsfavor; Denying 83 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, etc. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 08/02/2017. (ek)
|
|
Filing
30
OPINION. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 5/16/13. (jd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
