TRAINER v. ANDERSON et al
| STEVEN B. TRAINER |
| ROBERT ANDERSON, WAYNE STINE, STEVEN FARRELL, JUSTINE BERTONE, VINCENT MARTIN and MICHAEL GONZALES |
| 2:2012cv02409 |
| April 24, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Passaic |
| Madeline C. Arleo |
| Susan D. Wigenton |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
193
ORDER, that Judge Mannion 188 Report and Recommendations is Adopted and Modified as follows: Plaintiff's motion to re-open the case is Denied, Defendants' motion to enforce the Settlement agreement is Granted, and Plaintiff's remaining request are Denied as moot. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 11/20/2017. (JB, )
|
|
Filing
126
OPINION. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 3/13/2015. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 12 Motion for Leave to File amend. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 11/9/2012. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
6
OPINION AND ORDER; ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion, Docket Entry No. 5, seeking restoration of this matter to the Courts active docket, is granted; ORDERED that the Clerk shall reopen this matter by making a new and separate entry on the docket readin g CIVIL CASE REOPENED; ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims against John Doe are dismissed, and the Clerk shall terminate John Doe as Defendant in this matter; ORDERED that Plaintiffs challenges based on the circumstances of his arrest and on the taking of the 2006 Hyundai Santa Fe SUV are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; ORDERED that Plaintiffs challenges based on the allegedly too tightly appliedhandcuffs are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which r elief can be granted; ORDERED that Plaintiffs challenges alleging excessive force by Defendants Anderson, Stine, Farrell, Martin and Bertone (through acts of Anderson, Stine, Farrell, Martin and Bertone other than the act of placing Plaintiff in hand cuffs) shall proceed past the sua sponte dismissal stage; ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the Clerk shall issue summons, and the United States Marshal shall serve copies of the Complaint, summons, and this Memorandum Opinion and Order upon Defendants Anderson, Stine, Farrell, Martin and Bertone, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d);etc.. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 9/17/2012. (ld, )
|
|
Filing
2
OPINION AND ORDER; ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Clerk shall file the Complaint without prepayment of full filing fee; ORDERED that, the Clerk shall serve this Memorandum Opinion and Order upon the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey and upon the Warden of Plaintiffs current place of confinement by regular mail and duplicate the same by electronic service upon the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey; ORDERED that Plaint iffs complaint is dismissed for failure to comply with the requirements of Rules 8, 18 and 20; ORDERED the Clerk shall administratively terminate this action by making a new and separate entry on the docket reading CIVIL CASE TERMINATED; ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Memorandum Opinion and Order upon Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail, together with a blank civil rights complaint. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 5/22/2012. (ld, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
