NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION v. POSCO et al
| NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION |
| POSCO and POSCO AMERICA CORPORATION |
| 2:2012cv02429 |
| April 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Essex |
| Dennis M. Cavanaugh |
| Mark Falk |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
255
OPINION & ORDER denying POSCO's appeal/objection to the Special Master's order; affirming the order of the Special Master filed July 17, 2014. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 10/30/2014. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
235
OPINION & ORDER denying 196 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 9/9/2014. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
209
LETTER OPINION. Signed by Hon William L.E. Wertherimer on 6/27/2014. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
188
OPINION & ORDER regarding claim construction. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 6/4/2014. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
185
OPINION AND ORDER denying 137 Appeal Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court; affirming the decision of the Special Master signed in 8/22/2013. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 3/26/2014. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
113
OPINION. Signed by Judge Dennis M. Cavanaugh on 6/27/2013. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER regarding motion to stay the case pending reexamination. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 5/2/13. (LM, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
