ISPEC, INC. v. TEX R.L. INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. et al
| ISPEC, INC. |
| TEX R.L. INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., ZHONGSHAN MEIQUAN PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD., GEORGE CHEN, ALBEA GROUP, THIERRY RABU and SUN CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. |
| 2:2012cv04339 |
| July 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Bergen |
| Faith S. Hochberg |
| Patty Shwartz |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
OPINION. Signed by Judge Madeline C. Arleo on 8/3/2015. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
69
OPINION & ORDER denying 63 Motion to Vacate the order of 10/1/201; granting in part deft. Tex R.L. Industrial's 66 Motion to Vacate default judgment and dismiss complt.; vacating default judgment against Tex R.L. Industrial and quashing service of process upon deft. Tex R.L. Industrial; denying pltf's application for costs. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 8/20/2014. (nr, )
|
|
Filing
60
OPINION AND ORDER granting Sun Capital's 34 Motion to Dismiss ; granting Albea Services' 44 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ; granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Default Judgment; judgment is entered for the sum of $265,456.50 in favor of pltf. ISPEC, INC. and against deft. TEX R. L. INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 9/27/2013. (nr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
