MANNING et al v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. et al
| GREG MANNING, CLAES ARNRUP, POSILJONEN AB, POSILJONEN AS, SVEABORG HANDEL AS, FLYGEXPO AB and LONDRINA HOLDING, LTD. |
| MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., KNIGHT CAPITAL AMERICAS, L.P., UBS SECURITIES, L.L.C., E*TRADE CAPITAL MARKETS L.L.C., NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, L.L.C., CITADEL DERIVATIVES GROUP, L.L.C., JOHN DOES 1-10 (names being fictitious) and ABC COMPANIES 1-10 (names being fictitious) |
| 2:2012cv04466 |
| July 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Morris |
| Michael A. Hammer |
| Jose L. Linares |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
OPINION/ORDER denying 58 Motion for Leave to Appeal insofar as it seeks reconsideration of the Courts March 20, 2013 Opinion and Order; that Plaintiffs motion to certify for interlocutory appeal this Courts March 20, 2013 Opinion and Order to the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is GRANTED; that pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1292(b), within ten days from the entry of this Order, Plaintiffs shall file an appeal in the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 5/23/13. (DD, )
|
|
Filing
48
OPINION. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 3/18/13. (DD, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
