COACTIV CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. v. PRINTFACILITY, INC. and SHUJA SHABBIR
| COACTIV CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. |
| PRINTFACILITY, INC. and SHUJA SHABBIR |
| 2:2012mc00235 |
| September 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Katharine S. Hayden |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor on 8/5/13. (msd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: COACTIV CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. v. PRINTFACILITY, INC. and SHUJA SHABBIR | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PRINTFACILITY, INC. and SHUJA SHABBIR | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: COACTIV CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | WILLIAM B. CALLAHAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
