SAVITSKI v. CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, ETAL
Plaintiff: ANA SAVITSKI
Defendant: GSHR DIRECT AMERICA and CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Case Number: 2:2013cv00185
Filed: January 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Michael A. Hammer
Presiding Judge: Jose L. Linares
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SAVITSKI v. CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, ETAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANA SAVITSKI
Represented By: GLENN BRUCE CAREY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GSHR DIRECT AMERICA
Represented By: LEDA DUNN WETTRE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Represented By: EDWARD FRANCIS ROSLAK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?