GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. KAUL et al
| GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO CASUALTY CO. and GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. |
| RICHARD A. KAUL, M.D., NEW JERSEY SPINE & REHABILITATION PC, POMPTON ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, P.C., RODOLFO NARAG, M.D., DONG KWAK, M.D. and MICHAEL MCKEE, M.D. |
| 2:2013cv02597 |
| April 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Passaic |
| Claire C. Cecchi |
| Joseph A. Dickson |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER that, Defendant Richard A. Kaul's motion to vacate entry of default (Docket Entry No. 100) is granted; denying 72 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 5/30/14. (jd, )
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER VACATING Clerk's Entry of Default as to defts New Jersey Spine & Rehabilitation PC and Pompton Anesthesia Associates. P.C. only (Docket Entry( No. 17 and 18); withdrawing 40 Motion for Default Judgment; Defendants New Jersey Spine & Rehabilitation PC and Pompton Anesthesia Associates, P.C. are hereby granted leave to file an Answer to Plaintiffs'Complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of the entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 11/6/13. (jd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
