IBEW LOCAL 400 WELFARE, PENSION, ANNUITY, SUPPLEMENTAL, AND JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUNDS et al v. ALLTEK SECURITY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.
GUY PETERSON and IBEW LOCAL 400 WELFARE, PENSION, ANNUITY, SUPPLEMENTAL, AND JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUNDS |
ALLTEK SECURITY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. |
2:2013cv04344 |
July 16, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Union |
Steven C. Mannion |
Esther Salas |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 OPINION/ORDER granting 12 Motion for Default Judgment as to liability under the Labor Management Relations Act; that the Funds shall have thirty (30) days to establish their standing to bring a civil action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act; that the Court shall RESERVE its decision regarding the amount of damages to be entered against Defendant pending Plaintiffs submission of records and documentation stating an ascertainable amount; that Defendant shall make availab le to Plaintiffs, within thirty (30) days of service of this Opinion & Order, all books, records, and information necessary for Plaintiffs to determine the precise amount of Defendants delinquent contributions due to Plaintiffs pursuant to the terms of the agreements; that Plaintiffs shall have thirty (30) days to establish that they are entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs; etc. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 12/22/14. (DD, ) |
Filing 11 OPINION/ORDER that Plaintiffs have thirty (30) days to submit proof that Defendant AllTek has specifically assented to the agreements; that Plaintiffs shall specifically identify the provisions in said agreements upon which they rely to allege their claims; denying 10 Motion for Default Judgment without prejudice and directs Plaintiffs to re-file their motion for default judgment against Defendant within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order; etc. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 4/25/14. (DD, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: IBEW LOCAL 400 WELFARE, PENSION, ANNUITY, SUPPLEMENTAL, AND JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUNDS et al v. ALLTEK SECURITY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: GUY PETERSON | |
Represented By: | MARK E. POIST |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: IBEW LOCAL 400 WELFARE, PENSION, ANNUITY, SUPPLEMENTAL, AND JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUNDS | |
Represented By: | MARK E. POIST |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ALLTEK SECURITY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.