BOGERMAN v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
Plaintiff: SANDRA J. BOGERMAN
Defendant: UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
Case Number: 2:2013cv05247
Filed: August 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Morris
Presiding Judge: James B. Clark
Presiding Judge: Faith S. Hochberg
Nature of Suit: Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OPINION & ORDER granting 4 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed; this case is closed. ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 10/15/13. (jd, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOGERMAN v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
Represented By: RICHARD DOMINICK PICINI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SANDRA J. BOGERMAN
Represented By: ROBERT MICHAEL SILVERMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?