MCKINNON v. LOWERY

MCKINNON v. LOWERY

Petitioner:	MAURICE MCKINNON
Respondent:	LOWERY
Case Number:	2:2013cv07322
Filed:	December 5, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office:	Newark Office
County:	Essex
Presiding Judge:	Stanley R. Chesler
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 13, 2017	Filing 21 OPINION. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 12/12/17. (cm, )
May 2, 2014	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing the Clerk to administratively terminate this matter, w/out filing Petitioner's submission, and Petitioner is informed that administrative termination is not a "dismissal" for purposes of the statu te of limitations, & if matter is reopened in accordance with the terms of this Memorandum & Order, his application executed on the appropriate form would be deemed timely if Petitioner's original submission in this matter was filed timely. The Clerk shall forward Petitioner a blank in forma pauperis application, and that if Petitioner wished to reopen this matter, he shall so notify the Court in a writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court w/in 30 days. Upon receipt of a writing from Pet itioner stating that he wishes to reopen this matter, a complete, signed appropriate petition form and Petitioners filing fee or in forma pauperis application, the Clerk will be directed to reopen this matter; etc. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 5/2/14. (sr, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 13, 2017

Filing 21 OPINION. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 12/12/17. (cm, )

May 2, 2014

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing the Clerk to administratively terminate this matter, w/out filing Petitioner's submission, and Petitioner is informed that administrative termination is not a "dismissal" for purposes of the statu te of limitations, & if matter is reopened in accordance with the terms of this Memorandum & Order, his application executed on the appropriate form would be deemed timely if Petitioner's original submission in this matter was filed timely. The Clerk shall forward Petitioner a blank in forma pauperis application, and that if Petitioner wished to reopen this matter, he shall so notify the Court in a writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court w/in 30 days. Upon receipt of a writing from Pet itioner stating that he wishes to reopen this matter, a complete, signed appropriate petition form and Petitioners filing fee or in forma pauperis application, the Clerk will be directed to reopen this matter; etc. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 5/2/14. (sr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCKINNON v. LOWERY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: MAURICE MCKINNON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: LOWERY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?